So, a man that needs no introduction, but it is always my honor and privilege to do so. Cliff High is back with me. This is our third episode together over the course of maybe five or six years. I've had the opportunity to do these amazing one-on-one sessions with him. And guys, I mean, such a time, wild times we live in. And I'm just so grateful to have access to this guy. There's nobody else quite like him. Cliff, thanks so much for doing this with me today. >> Thank you much.
No worries. A great intro. >> A thanks. Yeah. So, you know, I've I've been practicing. I've been practicing. [laughter] >> I'm always nervous. I'm I never get nervous to do um just shows with with anybody else, but the Cliff High shows always give me nerves. I think it has to do with your following. I think it has to do with the viewership that our videos typically get and also our shows are typically followed by major life events and a lot of change ripples uh in
the collective. So, um there's a lot of things I'd love to talk about today and um we there I'm not even sure where to start. So, uh any suggestions, any anything you'd like to to jump into to get us warmed up here today? Sure. Let's let's do it this way. Let's do a leadin to your issue about uh the power. Okay. >> But let's do it this way. Let's actually reverse what I thought of and let's do a card poll. Okay. Because I I have a curiosity. And so my curiosity is I
would like to know what the event string can tell us about this idea. We know that there's so let me describe it a bit. their way of dealing with that because if they felt that and specifically what I'm thinking about is this um this meteor um or asteroid Apous which supposedly is coming back in 2029 and then maybe in or maybe it'll be 2030. I don't have an exact time frame on that. So do they fear something like that? And this is the cover for it because for instance we see Zuckerberg
he admits he's got a big tunnel under his house in Hawaii and that makes no sense to climate change. It makes no sense to the recently by the way Katherine Austin Fitz was on Tucker and was talking about all of this weird going on all the underground bases and stuff. Okay, underground bases don't make any sense in the if it's an ice age that they're fearing and that was what she was profering as as their motivation. Underground bases would not do you any good in an ice age. They
would if the ice were like, you know, big glaciers or something and suddenly there, but creeping in as an ice age. An underground base doesn't doesn't do you any good. So, so I'm one. Now, there's one other aspect of this. I don't know how we would phrase that, but is it an extinction level event they're afraid of, or is it the return of the space aliens? In in either of those two cases, if you had Apous, the meteor, or if you had space alien, real space alien invasion as in the form of the Elohim
coming back, that would make sense to have underground bases. >> All right, let's take a look here. So fascinating. So we have the ace of cups, the seven of swords and the four of cups. Now really what I asked here was I wanted to gauge their genuine fear. Who is they? Okay. And I also saw that interview. I watched it twice. Tucker Carlson and uh Katherine Fitz. Um she made mention of the BIS, the Bank of uh international settlements in Basil, Switzerland, and really was able to describe this kind of or
localize, at least in our minds, localize a power structure uh in which a lot of the global controls are, you know, uh managed. And so I when I think about who they are, I think about another term she used intergenerational pools of capital, I call them ancient gangs, right? And they're basically people that are just deeply rooted, deeply embedded. They have all the capital. They're sovereign. They have their own police force, their own set of rules and laws. So that's the they um as
far as I can tell and for the sake of conversation. Now what they are genuinely afraid of is this is not what I was expecting. [laughter] Um the Ace of Cups. So what they genuinely fear does not appear to be a cataclysm. Um the Ace of Cups traditionally is a renewal, a phase of regeneration and renewal and a kind of uh super fast, supercharged rush of information specific particularly around the emotional and um sort of spiritual field. Um that's what the Ace of Cups is. This is when you know people have um
a connection with the divine. So to them, that could be a cataclysm. There's not that many of them in comparison to us. Yes, they have the money, they have the tech, they have this, this, and that, but what they don't have is something that I've always considered to be consensus. They don't have the bulk of things. That's us. That's the surface population. Um, you know, the seven of swords is also some kind of betrayal, which is interesting. like their fear is is being betrayed and exposed. Um, and
so they're >> that makes sense, you know, because they are so vulnerable to exposure. >> So, and another thing as well here with the four of cups, they certainly fear um natural death. They seem to fear uh natural order. um basically doing its thing. Their whole mechanism appears to be centered around their agenda, their ability to stop natural processes or interfere with natural processes. So, it could be that they're making it out that this is, you know, they're they're creating this to
get ahead of some kind of cataclysmic event. It could just be they're scared to answer for their crimes when we figure out. [laughter] >> But of course, this is just my interpretation, >> but it also it also fits too because if they're afraid of a um uh there's still you can still find sort of information rumors that they're afraid of the a relieves my mind. So they're not I don't think they're really worried about Apotheus. That was the one thing that you can't control is you know the planet
being hit by a big rock, right? But if they're not worried about that, it makes so much sense that they're worried about something in their sense bigger because they hide from a rock in their underground bunkers. And that never made any sense to me though because if for instance you had those underground Zuckerberg's in Hawaii, he runs there, he flees, there's a big meteor strike, who the going to be there to serve him? who the is going to be there to dig him out when that thing is
buried under a mountain of debris or washed over by the ocean or whatever. So, humans need other humans. So, this makes a lot of sense. I'm actually, like I said, somewhat really I can deal with the space alien part, you know, that is no big deal. That's just expected. So, and to your point, um I think they may be aware that there is some kind of builtin global defense uh weapon system that was put here. I believe built and placed here by um the the people this the aliens. I see them as people. Um
they this earth is not just ours. I believe it is under the jurisdiction of some kind of hierarchal powers and we're not actually allowed to. This is why I think we were only allowed to experiment with nuclear. Um and we really were not allowed to go any further with nuclear capabilities because at that point we're affecting the planet on a molecular atomic level. We're now bleeding over our into real >> into everybody else. Right. >> Right. Well, so I know >> not I I don't I have no [laughter] idea
who put it there. Okay. But we have factual things throughout history uh that support the idea of like a planetary defense system. In my opinion, because I've really examined them, they're undeniable. One of them was the great Tonguska blast. right? Blew that thing up precisely uh you know one mile up in the atmosphere and the and the effects were huge on the planet but nothing compared to what it would have been had it hit and there was at the time there was no human capacity to do that right so we
know that there there is some level of incredible energy and it didn't just explode on its own from heat coming in we know that from examining the uh debris >> there's the other thing that was just recently which was I actually witnessed here which was the strange lights up over Vancouver um British Columbia those so when I I saw them down here 135 miles was the crow flies from their occurrence and and I'm on uh at 155 ft up they had to have been at least 8,000 ft probably closer to 10 or 12,000 when I run
through the energy calculations no matter what AI I use the energy calculations come out to about at minimum a 2.5 megaton explosion needed to create those lights. So that level of energy, right? So that's not human or if it is, it's unknown human technology. >> Uh so so I agree with you. There's there's some other stuff going on there. But this this actually makes me feel better because, you know, now I'm not worried about that aspect of it. >> Yeah. No, I I just I think and what's
interesting too is I think some [clears throat] an existential event such as an asteroid or something like that that was it seemingly was out of the hands of even the folks over in in Basil, Switzerland. All the money in the world can't save you in that kind of situation, right? So I think even with the the oncoming of an existential threat like that, we would then as a civilization be forced to reckon with our reality and who and what we are in relation to the rest of everything, the all who we are
from a planetary standpoint, from a galactic standpoint, and who we are as a species, as a race. And I I kind of get the sense that their um attempt to get ahead of the narrative um and and create all of these outs and hoard technology, hoarde knowledge, hoarde information is just a means to slow or curtail this inevitable resurgence um of really I I it's like a divine memory that I think is inherent within within human beings and integration of information changes paradigms. When people know things, it changes them. I
don't have to tell you. I'm preaching to the choir. >> Right. Right. Well, that's actually okay. So, that's actually that was my base level of assumption, right? that you're quite correct that they fear um the change and the loss of power more than anything and that they've been in control for at least 2400 years would be 2,700 years because I I think that they were in control throughout the entire Kaliuga and that all of our origins religions originated during that period
of time as other methods of control then there's all these layers and layers and layers upon that and so um uh so I agree with you that that is their ultimate fear And uh it may be that they actually um are putting out all of these other fears as misdirects for any of us that may catch on to that so that we don't zero in on it. But you're also quite correct. It's inevitable and and even if they recognize I don't know I would think they would be smarter and recognize that there are
yogas that time itself does a lot of this and that they can't escape and so you would of course universe wants us to go through it. I also don't think universe wants to eliminate humans. The fact that we're here and we've come through all of this uh we're supposed to it's supposed to happen this way. So, uh, I think we got big challenges ahead of us that are going to help us mature. Really, that's what it is. I was questioning whether or not, and you know, just because the powers
that be would fear apous or or fear some kind of like a hard contact um, doesn't mean that it's factual that we have to. They get screwy ideas all the time and their fears are not necessarily everybody can have confirmation bias basically. you know, they put all that money, the Vatican put all that money into astron into um astronomical people, um uh sites and facilities and stuff and and so far no yield from all the money they put into this, but that tends to support the Apous idea and so on. But it never
really sat well with me. You know, I kind of like the idea of tapping into the event stream to see what's going on at the moment in terms of, you know, this understanding of everything bubbling out. That's actually been quite freeing. That's why I've been concentrating on the ontology idea. Hopefully, that idea will seed itself because um you know, I think even I think everybody that is ritual-based in their religion could abandon the religion if they saw the universe talking to them uh personally every day.
Uh so you know you got a guy he's got all these reasons to be a you know a badass terrorist and so on. Would he do so uh if he thought his god didn't want him to? If he thought the relig the universe talking to him was his god talking to him. I don't care. It doesn't matter to me that they put a religion on it. But if you actually saw that and you had all the qualia coming in every day to reinforce it would you go that way? I don't think so. I think that kind of stuff as you say information changes
changes us. >> It changes people. It changes paradigms. It it just um it terraforms what I call the psychological terrain of of the planet and namely the west. You know, I was I was born in the western hemisphere. You know, this this place means a lot to me. So, I'm always that's my lens. That's my my worldview is is uh of the West. You know, it's so interesting you mentioned, you know, make reference to Apous. Katherine, if you guys haven't checked out the interview, go ahead and It's so
hard-hitting. It's fabulous. I I visibly I could notice Tucker visibly uh >> Yeah. Yeah. It's like she was >> She was just blowing him away. And I think he needed to hear this maybe more than anything else. Tucker needed to to to hear this information, to know this, and his people certainly needed to hear it as well. She did make reference to um a series called Threebody Problem. I hadn't I haven't seen it for myself, but I the gist of it is about planetary bodies that move into Earth's uh
basically it starts to interact with Earth and then all of these planetary things change. Floods, earthquakes, volcanoes, you name it. Um, >> I agree with Katherine about the three body problem. The three body problem movie is predictive and and there's also a series. I can't I think it was maybe Japanese that started it all or Chinese, but anyway, they um uh it's predictive programming to a great degree on us. They're trying to get us to think that way. They may indeed um uh think that there's something going
on uh planetarily, but these guys have a tendency in my opinion to um misinterpret information based on their uh assumptions. Okay? So assumptions will always come back and bite you in the ass. If these all right, all these guys have propped up gratology, Einstein relativity forever. Uh, they put it in place. They paid to put it in place. They paid to suppress Tesla and they paid to suppress Walter Russell and all of these other guys. The the grattologology view is inappropriate. It's stupid. It doesn't work. It's
rational materialism. Okay? And um everything is matter and if all life died, matter would still exist. And I don't buy that a minute. If you shed that uh assumption, that base level of assumption that all of their science is is built on then you get an entirely different view of reality and all of a sudden all kinds of things that were mathematically impossible become quite possible and very easily done. So, I'm I've had this big shift from and it takes a lot takes you really a lot of
time to work through your own assumptions to get to the idea that everything is consciousness and you need to turn your head 100% and look at everything as though everything is consciousness and then what does that do to your view? Now, even if I did not think that that that was factual, just being able to twist your perspective often brings new results and new thinking to you, right? >> Yes. But uh so these guys may indeed be so hidebound in their own understanding of relativity that they're
misinterpreting everything. And so I can see idiots like Zuckerberg putting billions into underground houses even though an underground house would not save you in the in the event of the conditions that he's actually fearing. You know, in fact, to me, it would be terrible to be in an underground house and then have a a cataclysm and then you're stuck. You're trapped. You've been tombed yourself, right? I mean, I would freak out about that kind of thing. >> Same. I think, >> you know, but but anyway though, this
it's fascinating trying to figure out what these guys are up to and what their um their mindset is. So, um there's a really smart guy out there by the name of Dan Pena, and he's a money guy. He's a really fantastic money guy, a billionaire kind of fellow. Um and he had this uh he was doing millisecond because of the huge amount of energy required to do so. Okay. So I know time travel is bogus in all forms. Uh but in any event though so um Jim Sinclair did that same kind of thing with money
analysis and his viewpoint was um it's very illuminating to do that because you see basically where they put their money is where their mind is and they will put money into movies and stuff as a deliberate control mechanism in my opinion for the humans right about this sort of thing. Now, the interview with Katherine, Katherine and I have a great deal of respect for. We fight frequently because we have differing opinions on stuff and because I think we and I think we have a lot of these different opinions.
>> You know her. >> Oh, yeah. >> Oh my god. >> Yeah, I know that. Oh, sure. I've known her for years. >> This This is how it is. Like, you know, [laughter] it's a small the the most brilliant minds in the world. Like, it's good. You guys You guys should know each other. That may That's like >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And we fight. We fight. I love I love her dearly. She's just just is a real treasure. I was so distressed. Okay. And so actually we
share same enemies. Exact. Exactly. Well, more than that, I mean, in terms of the the the details and so on. So yeah, but um so I've known Katherine since those days because Corey Good was also my enemy. I I bitched at him on Twitter and he ended up suing me. Uh but you know, and deep state money behind him and all of this kind of thing. Who hasn't he sued? Yeah. Who hasn't he attempted? The guy is a total. >> It was a It was a Cory Good, you know, intergalactic buttthead. But
>> intergalactic buttthead. You heard it here, gentlemen. I love that. No, it really all does make sense. you know, they'll attempt to blow up, you know, entire communities of, you know, schools of thought before they really start to take hold and and sort of unschool uh some brilliant minds among us. You know, God forbid this information gets to the the young ends and they come up with this this new understanding, this true understanding of what's been going on. that that's a huge threat and
certainly they >> that was a visible that was one of the the most fascinating things to watch from my perspective because it was visible to me what they were doing to Katherine and uh and to her and it also to Richard Dolan and dark journalists and all these people that were around Katherine in terms of focusing on the money to reveal the secret space program and all the disappearing trillions and all of that. Right. >> Yes. Uh so I you could see them moving uh and they were actually quite alarmed
in my opinion. The way that they the deep state moved and became so visible. They were very alarmed at her. They that she scared them um at a very uh significant level because she was making such a huge impact in such a short period of time. They just let loose with everything and and derailed her conferences and then it just all went to >> Yeah. >> So um you know it was just it was an interesting thing to watch. I've I've been, you know, respectful of her uh over time, but we have these differing
um uh assumptions on things, but we frequently arrive at the same conclusions uh you know, in general. So, uh I think that's valid, but we still fight. I send her emails and we still and moan at each other. [laughter] >> What an honor. Honestly, what an honor. It's it's a wonderful thing. And um you know the current state of the se the SSP the secret space program at least from like a a commercial standpoint is it's absolutely atrocious. It's ridiculous. It's comical. It's a
clown show. Um and I really >> clown show. >> Yes, it's a clown show. Just within the last I want to say six to eight years it has devolved into just something absolutely laughable and I regret >> by design. by design certainly and I regret to see that because this is such hard-hitting uh information and it would absolutely uh you know change the face of of the psychological terrain um and and strengthen our understanding about our origins and and our potential muddy the waters you know t classic CIA for
you typical >> get people emotionally whipped up and then you can move them right once you got the emotions because that's what it takes to have decisions So I bitched people that say AI can have a decision. It can't. Can can only follow logic trees in the software. In order to make any decisions and have any motivation, you have to have emotion. No AI will ever have emotion, right? That's a chemical process within us. You need flesh. But this brings up something we could pull on. The second one actually
the second one I wanted to ask about. So, I'm of the opinion that BTC would Bitcoin was was to be one of their vehicles and it got out through people like me through the ontology letting me know about it and all of these other things and we start talking about it ahead of time. Right? So, there were a lot of people that were irritated that cryptocurrency >> this is the exact opposite of this [laughter] >> the the exact opposite. So all of this I I'm going to go ahead and cosign on your
theory here, your belief that Bitcoin I think maybe in the beginning um well certainly in the beginning may have been created to to um you know utilize funds and resources within a contained ecosystem. They've lost control of the bus. Something fell out of the bottom and now it's its own. It's almost like a free and open slate and So let's hold up that that one card there too because we we need to note the all of the influences of the of the eternal now that we exist in and the event stream.
So that was card 17 in a numerological sense. 17 becomes eight. Eight is the supreme lucky number for the Chinese. >> That's right. >> Um okay. But also eight for the uh Greeks and the Egyptian was the number of infinity. it is the number prior to the number of completion which is nine and so that so again I think that this is the um the event stream and the ontology telling us that this is an accurate understanding and that there's a further layer there and this was what I was trying to to determine.
[clears throat] So the question was is resolved but it had this other hidden aspect in terms of the assumption. If it was still under the control of the uh of DARPA and the people and so on of the the financial system then we would not get an infinity card. We wouldn't get the star >> but also it would mean that uh uh what I'm seeing was not actually occurring as I think it is. So here's here's the where my mind springs from that. I think I'm seeing the uh use of Bitcoin
uh coming up u by the administration here both as a weapon but also as the method by which they will suck up all of those trillions of illegally created dollars and get them out of the system such that they can maintain the dollar and keep it going. We have we're at the end of the system like you were saying they reset every hundred plus years right 100 to 112 years. This has to do with the lifespan of the currencies. Most currencies die within 50 currencies unless you do something. They've done
everything they could to keep it going. We've been in petro dollar >> down or however many you know however long that period is. I find that it's it's I get that it's brief. I don't think this is going to be like a year where everything is shut off, but I do I'm kind of getting this, you know, this interim, this this gray area where things are very, you know, there's cover and they're able then to, you know, make these make these moves, make these changes. Um, and I know everybody wants
to know about when when's it going to happen? And the short answer is I don't know. The short answer is I don't know. They have their plans. They have their deadlines, but by the way it looks, we're we're probably going to see a whole bunch of of major changes before the year 2030. That doesn't give us much too much time, but um no, I I have to say I, you know, I don't really do too much research on my own by way of uh Bitcoin cryptocurrency. It's not something that, you know, personally
interests me, but as you guys know, I'm not really a money person. I'm more of a, you know, I like cryptids and, you know, primary waters and I like aliens and stuff like that. But, you know, the economy is more than just the economy. This is also energy. This is how energy moves through our planet and it's extremely important. So, um, I'm I'm optimistic about, you know, the future implications of Bitcoin. And I do love the the notion of blockchain technology as being uh a means of keeping things
transparent and never allowing this kind of squeeze of trillions of dollars to be, you know, slushed into some kind of, you know, uh secret uh secret operations that should really never be allowed to happen again. So, this does look like a means to um to correct that problem. So, um I'm optimistic. Also, the the Eon card there would suggest um doing stuff under the covers. The Trump guys will have to do a lot of this stuff surreptitiously so that we don't find out about it. Not because they're trying
to hide it from us, but if you if everybody knows about it, it won't go down. People would front run it, etc. Right. >> Well, yeah. And military military strategy is the tale as old as time. You never ever discuss an operation as it's happening ever. You can talk about it years later. you can't talk about it while it's happening. So, they do have to create conditions that to the surface population uh seems like it could, you know, could feel like the end of things. It could feel very dramatic and very
scary and yet we this is the nature of of this planet is things are things are happening. We don't necessarily have the whole you know the full spectrum awareness of it but there are moves being made and and you know things are happening. So, um, uh, something else I would like your thoughts on here. Um, I just the other day, I believe it was Monday. I had very I had a sleepless night Sunday night, I was just getting so much stuff. The astral realm was so active. I kept getting pulled awake and
pulled awake and pulled awake. So, I'm like, something's happening. Something's going on in the ether. Um and then Monday there was this massive outage blackout I believe Spain, Portugal, um >> parts of France, parts of Greenland. Y >> and then Sunday is interesting because you know what happened on Sunday night and just before the power outage because we're the time difference for us because it was Europe versus US. We had a huge sh resonance disruption giant giant level and it went on for hours.
That makes sense. That's that makes I because I >> directly feeling the electromagnetic >> I had a terrible night then too and then all this stuff breaking around here and stuff. So So that all fits, right? And this is um Okay. So we live in a weird little ontology. And so so an ontology is a a universe speaking to us, right? It it's seeking limits of its own existence trying to create novelty through us. we're the we're the neural net through which it it's doing its um
AI if you want. But um so it was speaking to us and we'll never in my opinion they'll never be able to pull off their depopulation. They'll never be able to take over the the planet and all of this stuff because they're operating on and they don't understand that the ontology is directing all of us and wants to create these conditions and get the energy moving such that novelty could break out. and novelty is not going to break out if we live in a utopia. We're just going to sit there
peaceful as sheep almost, right? Uh that evil and disruption and and uh agitation and all of this stuff is a necessary part of this universe in order for it to achieve its goal, which is to create knowledge. >> I could totally see that. We need the pressure, you know. >> Exactly. Exactly. It's a pressure cooker and without the steam, nothing gets cooked, right? And the goal is to cook um novelty out of all of us. So I see this as a time where okay so I don't see time as everybody uh else does versus
most people. So we are in a period where um the event stream is manifesting um magnificent amount of stuff and we're starting to understand that we live in this eternal now that doesn't go forward can't ever go back and that we think of time what we think of time is just all of the events that are that are rushing out of the event stream at us. um energy crystallizing into matter, if you will, and motion through matter and people and so on as a result of the energy itself. And we make decisions on that that feeds
into the the whole thing is karma. We make a decision that feeds back into the event stream and creates the stuff that's going to come out to us in the future. >> And so get this continual grind and that's why the Buddhists say everything is grist for the mill because the mill is the event stream and we're to receive it all. Okay? So the archology is good to us that if you look at the event stream and see ahead, you get qualia. Okay? And so the qualia is a bit of communication, a bit of meaning that
comes to you. And so it can be really small um can be magnificently small. It could be really huge. All of a sudden you round a corner and you know there's a vista that you had been in your mind for years and that vista matches up with whatever image was in your mind from whatever source. And that's a quality from the universe telling you to examine that source to feel about that. And mostly it wants us to feel about things so that we can think about them in an appropriate way. And it and it affects
our decisions mostly, especially with women, but even with men, mostly our decisions are affected by the universe screwing with our emotions, altering our emotions through these qualia. And so you know when you're sitting there and you you you know when you're psychic, you'll feel it. You'll feel yourself with the tingle with the cards and the stuff like that, right? And so so that's going to be a good reading and you know that universe is communicating through you at that point. I think part of our
situation now, the unfolding, the reset, the summer of emergence, secrets revealed, all of this is to get us to the point where we operate in that kind of understanding, that level of understanding as much as possible uh throughout our lives. That we don't live as materialists thinking that everything is random chance and that life sprung from, you know, two God molecules smacking into each other, that kind of a deal. And because >> if you do have this ontological view then all of our science changes and also
then you can see karma being writ large you know in front of you now when they when they go in it happened >> and and so we have to eliminate a lot of these things from our language and I'm grappling with an understanding of the event stream because it occurs to me that all of my work for all of these years that led to all these predictions that were in fact that manifest that came out as fact in some manner uh is basically an ability to see ahead in the event string that's not it it may have
been unique to me in my approach but the idea that we can do that uh is starting to catch on and I think we will have an entirely different understanding of our reality and our our experience once we get into this and it leads to the point where uh you could trust someone that was an ontologist, even a space alien. If the space aliens come up here, show up here and they start talking about the ontology and and qualia, whatever they term it, and that's how they live because we know that their science is
superior because they got here. We can't we can't make offplanet, you know, instantaneous travel yet supposedly. But um so you could trust an ontologist because they're never going to do anything uh against uh that trust because they know how they would themselves would be damaged in the event stream because of messing with the karma. >> And so kind of like um uh there really aren't too many analogies to get the idea across, but um so uh so you could actually trust an ontologist with zero point energy. So if
you found a group of Africans in a village, you could give them zero point technology if they were ontologically motivated and understanding because you know none of those individuals are going to turn it into a weapon right technology into that portion of the civilization. You could probably introduce it to Russia because they don't have the the really the motivation to be planet destroyer kind of guys and that's what zero point technology gives you is incredibly powerful weapons. But I think we're there now. So, uh,
Katherine's, um, interview with Tucker, uh, now we've got, um, uh, people like Ashton Forbes running around describing the NH 370 flight and how it was disappeared. And, uh, I think he's accurate in his, uh, conclusion >> or they may even be designing it now. So, there's something about what people call remote viewing. I think that kind of perception, at least as it's described, can sometimes feel more accurate in the moment than it does later on. If it's something that already
exists, people often report getting more concrete details. And if it's something that's still forming or manifesting, they may not get as much clarity. This is part of why I think they're really dealing with what I call the event stream. And maybe Dick Algy is correct about how some of this could show up. There is also the issue of the power line and the power outage. The power outage in Spain, Portugal, France, southern France, and Greenland because of the way things are interconnected
coincided with that big shift in the human resonance that a lot of us slept through and felt later. My dogs were restless all night and causing me issues. And many people reported feeling off during that period. So, I have a tendency to think there may have been multiple factors at play during that power outage, both technical and environmental, and it really got my attention. Coincidentally, a few days before that, Spain was out there saying, "We're 100% renewable. We've got batteries and wind and all of that."
From my perspective, I always find it interesting how quickly reality can challenge big public declarations and force systems to prove themselves over time. All of this is in a way self-s serving for me because I'm trying to make plans for my own future. I need some level of guidance in terms of a framework I can work with. In many ways, what I'm seeing now is lining up with the things I've seen in the data. So far, it's been very reinforcing, but I still don't completely trust it when I
try to apply it directly to myself. That part is always tricky. Yeah, thanks for that. It really set my mind at ease on a bunch of things. So, one more thing in that same line of thought, their attempt to create what's called the EU central bank digital system. They're trying to establish the digital euro and are projecting it to be fully integrated and officially operational by October 2025. Bix had me look at some of your data and we were examining some of the emotional output. We used the cards to try to
understand the nature of these emotional emissions. Basically, what's behind all of this? It did seem to be centered around finances and especially where energy meets resources, our ability to spend money, earn money, and feed ourselves, that kind of thing. While I dug a little bit deeper, it appeared that they've already run into some technical issues in earlier tests. They've had reliability problems in their prototype system, for example, back in February. So on one hand they're
trying to inspire trust among people in Europe talking about this new way of doing money and on the other hand they still seem to be struggling with keeping everything running smoothly. For me that highlights a bigger issue for large centralized projects and for what people often call the establishment. They have ambitious goals but complex software systems are hard to make robust at scale. I've worked from the other side too. I've been a consultant to government. One thing I've noticed is
that information traveling through big institutions often becomes distorted as it moves from the bottom to the top. There are incentives at each stage to present things in the best possible light and that can lead to data that doesn't perfectly reflect reality. Many times people at lower levels don't want to tell their bosses that they're missing targets or failing to meet certain objectives. So they smooth the numbers or estimate in a way that looks better. A lot of the automation projects
I worked on were about trying to keep these distortions from traveling too far up the chain. But there are always things that software can't catch. I ran into this with resource management. The state of Washington needed to know how many fish of what type were being captured every year to manage the fisheries. There were financial and environmental reasons behind this and the data really mattered. You find that the people going into the field, the fish biologists who would check the streams, sometimes relied on rough
estimates. As part of my job digitizing the system, I had to go all the way down to see how the work was actually done in order to design the database structure and the formats properly. I had to make sure the software wouldn't distort the data as it was being input because that can happen very easily. I saw how in big systems, there's no perfect feedback loop to keep every single person fully accurate all the time. I'd go out with some of these guys and we'd stand by a small stream and they might estimate
that 2,500 salmon could come up that stream to spawn. I could see that yes, the stream would be larger and deeper at certain times of the year, but still some of those numbers felt very optimistic. Those figures would then flow into the system and get turned into financial decisions and policy. The people doing the fieldwork weren't necessarily being malicious. They had their own incentives, schedules, and preferences. Sometimes they focus on the areas they liked working in, and they might generalize from one stream to
several others instead of visiting each site in detail. And in any group, there's a tendency to take shortcuts and rely on assumptions. If there's no strong feedback to keep everyone precise, over time those assumptions can harden into facts in the system even though they started as guesses. Then somewhere up the chain, those numbers might be translated into budgets and programs. So my takeaway is that in large bureaucracies, it's easy for data to drift away from the ground truth simply because we're all human and we
all respond to incentives. That's why I personally tend to be cautious about official numbers. I see them as starting points, not absolute truth. The same kind of dynamic shows up when people talk about digital currencies and centralized systems. You can design a very sophisticated model on paper, but when you actually roll it out, you're dealing with real people, real incentives, and real world complexity. I've also done software development myself and I know that on a big complex system there's a kind of informal
metric. X amount of time to develop the code. Y amount of time to test it and find out what doesn't work as expected and Z amount of time to revise and fix it. Most planning focuses heavily on X, the development part, and underestimates Y and Z. They don't always allow enough time for discovering and fixing all the bugs and edge cases. So, I'm not particularly afraid of central bank digital currencies in the sense that I think they're omnipotent or unstoppable. I see them as extremely complex software
projects that will inevitably run into many practical challenges. We can look at social credit systems, for example. In my opinion, these systems frequently experience failures and unintended consequences. Over time, I think there's a risk that such systems can end up excluding more and more people simply because of how the rules are structured and how enforcement incentives work. If your job is to enforce the rules of a system, you're usually judged by numbers, how many cases you handled, how
many people you flagged, how many infractions you recorded. If you're not careful, that can create a pattern where more and more people get pushed outside the system or penalized, which can become self-defeating. So, from my perspective, there's a built-in tension. The more strictly such a system is enforced, the more strain it can put on the society that depends on it. That's why I see these systems as inherently fragile in the long run. They can make glossy, attractive promotions about new
ways of doing things, slick campaigns, promises of convenience, and so on. And that can appeal to a lot of people. But at the core, I think many of these highly centralized, heavily monitored systems risk undermining themselves over time. Part of the appeal is psychological. People within the system want to present it as stable, powerful, and inevitable. No one likes delivering bad news to their bosses and that feeds into the way these systems are marketed and maintained. Kathern Austin fits and
I agree on this. She's very focused on how systems are incentivized, how the internal rules and rewards can lead to outcomes that cause problems for people and sometimes for the system itself. When I was dealing with the Cory Good lawsuit, I spent time analyzing the court system from my own point of view. I had an attorney at first, but I ended up representing myself because of the costs and because I wanted a more direct role. This was before AI tools were available to assist me. I developed what
I thought was a very logical strategy. One key part of that strategy was to challenge jurisdiction in a way that didn't immediately surrender to it. That approach later got some attention from lawyers who wrote to me saying it was a creative angle that could be useful in other cases. I also noticed that judges, like everyone else in a system, are influenced by workload, schedules, and internal incentives. They have calendars and responsibilities they're trying to manage. Understanding how those
practical factors shape decisions can be just as important as understanding the written law. So, I submitted my documents in a specific order and structure, knowing that it would present the court with certain choices. My goal was to create a situation where the simplest and most attractive option from the judge's point of view would also be the outcome I was seeking. Ultimately, I was the only person who got removed from that particular case, which was exactly what I wanted from my angle. That
outcome showed how understanding procedure and incentive can matter just as much as the black and white text of statutes. A lot of people assume everything in the legal world is purely about the abstract law. But in day-to-day practice, procedure plays a massive role. If you understand how procedures work, you get a clearer picture of why certain decisions happen the way they do. Over time, I've also come to see that many courts today operate within a framework shaped by public policy and administrative rules.
That doesn't mean there's no law. It means the law is interpreted through the lens of that policy environment. Once you understand that, you can navigate it more realistically. The same is true for many large systems in different countries. If a system is designed in a way that harshly penalizes people and rarely offers a path back or rehabilitation, it can end up treating those people as permanent outsiders. That can be very hard on individuals and can also create long-term instability
for the system itself. So in my view, many of these tightly controlled digital and financial systems are not invincible. They are fallible. They're complicated and they can be manipulated by their own internal incentives. That's why I don't see them as all powerful even though the marketing often tries to present them that way. They want to promote the idea that they're too big to fail, that their way is the only way. I think it's important for people to know that this is just one narrative. There
are always alternatives and centralized systems are not the only path forward. At the same time, I don't see myself as any kind of savior. I'm just someone who's been observing and analyzing these patterns for a long time. If my work helps people think more clearly or feel more empowered, I'm grateful for that. But I don't build an ego around it. The bigger problem for the establishment in my opinion is that they can end up believing their own hype. It's like a con artist who starts believing his own
story. That rarely ends well in the long run. And folks, I know many of you express concern or want to send protection and support my way and I truly appreciate the goodwill. But from an on anological perspective, I don't see this life as being about the individual in the way we usually think. I tend to see it as one of many lives, one expression of a much larger journey. Anything I can contribute in this lifetime, I'm happy to do, but I try not to be attached to the outcomes. I act in the moment and let the results belong to
the wider universe. I used to be of the opinion, similar to some Hindu and Japanese traditions, that it was worthwhile to wear white as a way to reflect certain kinds of energetic or karmic input. Now, I'm more of the opinion that it's better to accept and experience the karma you've generated because those experiences are part of your growth. If it wasn't me doing this work, it would be someone else. Sometimes it's frustrating because it means I can't just go off and be
completely anonymous, but that seems to be part of the role I've ended up in. You know what I mean? When you become recognized, you end up with attention, both welcome and unwelcome. It can be annoying to have influence when all you want is to focus on your own projects, but also means you can help people see patterns they might otherwise miss. I get irritated when I see people in this space doing it carelessly or irresponsibly. That's part of why I've earned the reputation I have. I keep
pushing on certain issues because sloppiness in this area can mislead a lot of people. It's not about thinking I'm always right. It's about wanting the work to be done thoughtfully. Well, it really is. and I call them the fates. I have kind of a pagan worldview and I imagine these energies as older women weaving us and our events together almost like a living tapestry. That's just how I personify it in my mind. I can't fully express how it feels to see how things have played out. I never
could have imagined they would unfold exactly the way they have. The effect that certain people have had on each other and then by extension on the rest of us has been nothing short of fascinating and to me deeply moving. I feel incredibly grateful for the people that the universe has brought into my life. It often feels less like meeting someone for the first time and more like a reunion like reconnecting with souls I've known before. For me, it's a testament to something larger, a kind of
divine orchestration or cosmic intelligence at work. My best friend of nearly a decade, one of the most integral people in my life, ended up deeply connected to someone else who has shaped my path in profound ways, and that's you, Cliff. I was captivated by your work when I was 19 years old. At the time, a lot of people around me didn't understand why I was so drawn to it. It didn't make sense on the surface, but looking back now, it's amazing to see how all of that was setting the
stage for what would happen later. I never could have imagined that two people who changed me so much and altered the course of my life would find each other in this way. It's powerful to see how those threads come together. I just want to express my gratitude for what I'll call divine orchestration in this lifetime. I'm honestly blown away. I think I speak for a lot of people when I say we love to see the change, the growth, and the evolution in you. I notice a change in you, your energy,
your outlook. And it's beautiful to see. Well, it really is the fates. And like I said, I picture them as these wise older women weaving us all together and weaving events together. That's just my image, but it helps me make sense of it. I can't tell you enough how it feels to witness how things have unfolded. I never could have guessed it would work out this way. And the impact that you and others have had on each other and then on all of us is nothing short of remarkable. It energizes me. It
motivates me. It strengthens my belief that miracles are real, that novelty is here, and that the universe is constantly speaking through events and relationships. And I'm just deeply grateful. I'm excited. I know I've kept you here for quite a while. So, we're going to wrap this up, but Cliff, thank you so much for doing this today. Thank you very much also for being that conduit that the universe picked. You were a pivot point and I pivoted around you as appropriate. I have a lot of
gratitude for all the gifts and connections that came through that. I've got to go now, but I want to leave people with this. It really feels like as a collective, we're a major crossroads. We're going to have to choose intentionally and deliberately the kind of world we want to live in. That means you vote with your resources, you vote with your health, you vote with your money, and you do everything as consciously as you can. We stay engaged, we keep learning, and we don't give up.
That's my closing statement. I really do hope we can do this again because there are so many other things I want to get your thoughts on. Ladies and gentlemen, Cliff High, the one and only and in my view, a real asset to this community. I don't have any ego about all of this. I'm just grateful for the chance to contribute. And I have a great deal of gratitude for the ontology, for the universe, for providing me with that gift at this point, that connection through you, to your best friend, and to
all of these people listening. And we will do this again in the future. All right. So folks, we'll have links in the description. If you'd like to get readings with me, my website will be down below. Also, if you like what you saw here today and you feel called to support my work, you can subscribe to my Patreon. I do all kinds of things there, readings, discussions, and content that's shaped by what the subscribers are interested in. Whatever the people want, that's what I aim to deliver.
Thank you so much, Cliff, for sharing me with your audience and giving me this platform and this time. All right, ladies and gentlemen, have a wonderful rest of your day and I'll see you next time. Bye. This video of Cliff High actually continues, but due to YouTube policies, I can only share this much here. If you'd like to watch the rest, please click the link in the description. Cliff Hi is an American data analyst, linguist, and technology expert. He is best known for his predictive linguistics method in which
he analyzes large data sets gathered from the internet to forecast future events. According to Hi, people unconsciously express their fears, hopes, and expectations about the future through the language they use online. By analyzing these language patterns, he believes it's possible to detect signals about upcoming events embedded in the collective subconscious. Hi's most recognized work is the webbot project, a system he launched in the late 1990s. This project aimed to scan and process
open textual data across the internet using natural language processing techniques. The webbot system collects words, phrases, and expressions from websites, forums, blogs, and social media, tracking emotional and semantic trends over time. Hi believes that shifts in these trends reflect the emergence of future events. Some of the most cited predictions made by the webbot include the 9/11 attacks in 2001, the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, and the 2008 financial crisis. However, the systems accuracy has become a topic of
debate. Notably, its predictions about the world ending in 2012 failed to come true, attracting significant criticism. Some observers claim that many of Hi's predictions are too vague and open to interpretation, comparing his method to the Barnum effect, where general statements are perceived as highly accurate by individuals. Nevertheless, Hi continues to enjoy a large following, particularly among those interested in conspiracy theories and alternative worldviews. Beyond the Webbot project,
Cliff High shares insights on a wide range of topics, including technology, artificial intelligence, UFOs, cryptocurrencies, ancient civilizations, and hidden knowledge. On his YouTube channel, he frequently discusses ideas outside of mainstream science, what he refers to as Woo. In these broadcasts, he talks about major future shocks, upcoming social collapses, economic breakdowns, and the evolution of human consciousness. While his ideas often provoke skepticism in scientific circles, they resonate deeply with a
segment of the population seeking unconventional perspectives. In recent years, Hi has increasingly focused on cryptocurrencies. He views Bitcoin and certain altcoins not only as investment vehicles, but as tools of global liberation through decentralization. He predicts the eventual collapse of the traditional financial system and the rise of decentralized economies that empower individuals over institutions. Clify also has a distinctive personal style. His talks often blend technical details with historical references and
philosophical insights. He doesn't shy away from mixing scientific methods with mystical or intuitive elements, positioning himself more as a digital prophet of the modern era rather than a conventional scientist. In conclusion, Cliff High is a unique figure in the digital age, using the massive data resources of the internet to make bold and unconventional predictions. While controversial in academic circles, he remains an inspiring figure in alternative media communities. His word challenges us to consider how collective
online expressions might reveal hidden truths about the future and whether such knowledge can help us prepare for what lies ahead.
Post a Comment