Would three or even four digits in the silver nominal price, the price that we see, would that be outrageous? No. It's worth at a minimum,300 bucks an ounce. And that's just based on the 20th to one that historically we were. This these were both well, it's peace dollar. Okay. These are both a dollar little $1 gold coin and a silver dollar. So that's a 20 to1 ratio right there. So uh according to my calculations, you're looking at the true fundamental value of an ounce of gold at


somewhere between 33 and $40,000 an ounce. >> Welcome to Gold Silver News, your go to destination for all things economics and finance. Whether you're an experienced investor, an inquisitive student, or just someone who wants to stay ahead in today's everchanging economic landscape, you've come to the right place. I've been working on a private road map for viewers who are more focused on protecting their wealth than speculating in uncertain markets. I'll share it at the end for those interested. Now, we'll


show you the best clips of the latest interview. But first, smash the subscribe button, hit the like button, and send us super thanks if you find our daily recaps valuable. enjoy the episode. >> Well, I personally do not see it I see it as inevitable because what gold really does is it regains confidence. I mean, they want us to think that gold is an old relic except wedding rings are generally in gold. You know, good is gold. It's in our vernacular. It's in our DNA and it's used to regain public


confidence after that massive failure which I believe we are like this close to experiencing and the hyperinflation. But make no mistake, every single country has a gold revaluation account. they're not going to do it at these levels because it does not reflect all the paper money that's been issued. So, what I think we will see and and it's it's just a repetition of history because this has happened over 4,800 times. I don't think this time is any different and that's really what the


point is. But they have to, you know, I mean, you have to kind of back up to move forward. If they did it now at the artificial level that the spot markets are, then it wouldn't have as great an impact if they wait until they finish blowing up the currency in about a massive hyperinflation. And what they do then is, of course, they lop off zeros so people think, well, they've got this under control. So you've got a loaf of bread. And I know this sounds outrageous, but it's not outrageous. It is just a repetition of


history where a loaf of bread might go for as it as it enters hyperinflation, a loaf of bread might go for $80,000 a loaf, right? But then what happens? They lop off three zeros or four zeros as they do that overnight revaluation. And so it goes from $80,000 a loaf to $8 a loaf. But so do your savings and so do anything that you've accumulated in fiat and frankly so will the nominal price of gold. First it'll go up massively right in the hyperinflation and but the difference between say your


stocks and all everything else that drops dramatically immediately upon the revaluation. Whereas gold, it's on average, so I can't guarantee this, but on average will stay up at that level for about 9 months before it too gets revalued, but then it instantly begins to climb again in terms of that new currency. So that is what I anticipate seeing. I don't anticipate seeing it before we do uh hyperinflation because there is not yet the need to regain that public confidence. But I watch that like


a hawk because that my friend is the only thing that's keeping all of this stuff together. Well, speaking of trying to keep things together, the Genius Act, stable coins, these are two things that you mentioned before we hit record today that you've been watching very closely. Walk us through the basics of what the Genius Act is and why you think the US government has introduced it. >> Well, the Genius Act is the first uh legal foundation for cryptocurrencies and stable coins in particular. I


personally believe I mean there are many reasons why we this administration made the choice to legalize that. I mean, there's definitely stakes in the game, but it had to happen anyway because we're moving into a new digital system. And what nobody really realizes yet, and I'm so glad I'm old because I've lived through this and I know how to recognize it and I've studied it since 1987. When President Trump signed the Genius Act, he changed the global monetary system. And I believe that and and you


know, I'll put my technical neck on the line with this. I'm not even giving myself any wiggle room in here. Um although of course I will say I could be wrong but I but from the tip of my head to the bottom of my feet and every single area in between I believe that this will now usher in the hyperinflation to burn off the debt that's being created. But make no mistake at all when he signed that the monetary system changed. Period. Now, the fact that most people don't know about it yet is not relevant,


but I was there in 1965. I was about 11 years old at that point. So, I didn't really understand what happened, but I remember that period of time. And I was there in 1971 when we went off the gold standard. And I remember I was about 17 years old. So I definitely remembered all of the chaos and everything around that currency regime shift and there is not one doubt in my mind that we just experienced that couple weeks ago or three weeks ago how whenever he did that the beginning of this month.


>> Dear listeners, the renowned economist went on to discuss the following topics in his speech. I am sharing it with you exactly as he conveyed it and that was roughly you know look this is the way I perceive President Trump he is a transformation catalyst this transformation had to occur because we have exhausted all the purchasing power value in this material and once you accomplish that there is nowhere left to inflate away you must strike principle but since at the same moment what has


been occurring is a shift in the alliances on a global scale so the rest of the world has as we understand they have been moving away from the US Treasury market which is the bedrock of the global financial structure. Well, when one marketplace disappears, they have to discover a new one. And so by authorizing the Genius Act and obligating all of the stable coins at least that are released by this country to be dollarbacked onetoone what he has done is established a new synthetic market just like Kissinger created back


in the 70s and 80s with the petro dollar. So that is what he is attempting to accomplish and right now according to a recent report think about this because it is insane right but in a recent report by the St. Lewis Federal Reserve they discuss the influence of the stable coins and right now there are about 125 billion stable coins in this market and most of them it might be I do not have this figure in front of me but somewhere between I think it is even 99% of currently all stable coins that are


released are dollar-based and they have been adopted heavily in third world countries particularly in Africa where their currencies are undergoing very very high inflation so what he has done is he has ensured that every new stable coin that is going to be released by any corporations in the US because that is who releases them. We do not want CBDC's here. Okay. Well, I am fairly certain we do not want stable coins either, but the CBDC's have a central location and there would simply be one per country. The


stable coins are released by any corporation. So we will have Amazon stable coins and Walmart stable coins and Kmart stable coins and you know J C Penney as well as JP Morgan as well as Hong Kong stable coins the Yuan stable coins. So it is an exceptionally fragmented market but they are estimating that within the next 2 and 1/2 years by 2028 they will expand from about 125 billion stable coins to $2 trillion in stable coins. and they're actively constructing the legal framework of safe harbors and exemptions


in all of these mechanisms. So if I take you back to 2008 and the great financial crisis where what these bankers did was repulsive and vile and brutal and devastated so many people's lives, nobody went to prison and they did not go to prison because legally they did not do anything wrong. Morally it was terrible, but legally it was not. And they're building that same type of system up now and promoting all of this experimentation. And guess who the guinea pigs are? And guess who is just


about the correct size to fail? But that is also why I say that this is what is ushering in the hyperinflation. Because the simpler and less costly it is to generate new money and distribute new money, the more will be generated, the more will be distributed. And truly, how do you even evaluate any of these cryptocurrencies? I mean, if they produce a physical representation because that is all this is. These are not Bitcoin or Ethereum or XRP. They are the physical representation. And I find it so intriguing that they make them


resemble 1 oz gold coins. Psychological. Yeah. And revolting. Very captivating. Yeah. And you know, inflation is theft. And when theft is made lawful, you are being governed by criminals. That is the condition we are in. Governments are essentially criminal syndicates that have legalized their own offenses and the bankers and central banking system is a massive component of that. The fact that people have not awakened to that collectively is a little discouraging. A topic we're going to dive into a little


bit later. But first, I want to emphasize something you recently published. A potential shift in the composition of the Fed's portfolio of Treasury holdings could lead to the central bank purchasing nearly $2 trillion of bills over the next two years according to Bank of America. You then added the hashtag got gold. Are we observing Japanese style yield curve control approaching where the Fed could end up becoming the primary buyer of US treasuries to attempt to keep yields low 100%. So, but now consider these


figures, right? If you have two trillion coming in through stable coin issuance and the Fed performing an about turn onto of their balance sheet of two trillion that practically covers all that new debt that emerges in that big beautiful bill does it not does it not you know I mean it's simply to keep the game continuing and they can as long as the public retains confidence in the system because bank-to bank confidence that concluded in 2008 central bank to central bank confidence and If you want


me to expand on any of these in greater detail, but that concluded in 2015 market to central bank, remember that they would inform the banks what they were going to do. Forward guidance, we're going to inform you what we are going to do so you can move into position. But that concluded in 2022. So there's only one layer of confidence that remains in this system and that is the public still hoping beyond hope that this can recover some of its value. That is opium. That is not a sound plan. and


it does not really function either because the cards are stacked against. >> If your priority right now is not chasing returns but protecting what took decades to build, I've put together a private road map linked below. If your priority right now is not chasing returns, but protecting what took decades to build, I've put together a private road map linked below. O.